The issue that concerns me today in this Article is the problen will occupy us for much time this year, because I am convinced that next year will be overshadowed by the campaign and presidential and regional elections, and is the National Assembly at its tert was 
legislature (2011-2016).
legislature (2011-2016). AN these last days has been the scene of many events that have raised a dusting of oponiones, pro and con. First, I will refer to the brawl staged in the National Assembly last week by the Deputy for the State of Falcon (PSUV) Henry Ventura and state Rep. Miranda Alfonso Marquina (MUD). Beyond the assessment of each who for me is very clear that the deputy Ventura came to violate the Deputy Marquina because the latter dared to approach the rostrum of the presidency, as if it were sacred ground. Marquina as a human being could not answer other than defense and thank God the situation was there.
My description of what happened is the following: Almost immediately made a lot of Venezuelan traditional media, as well as social networks, expressing their anger and outrage at what happened with the air of chronic Puritanism. Haber, not true that we are in a highly polarized side have 98 deputies red force on the blue side and 67 enclosed in a chamber, like cats and mice imprisoned in a cell, although it is not ideal to happen, we can not forget that it is not the first time. In the so-called Fourth Republic did a lot of times. Even in the first term of the NA was a physical attack by the then Deputy Táchira, now governor of that state, César Pérez Vivas and even the same state Rep., Iris Valera.
Even in parliaments in many countries around the world has happened many times. Therefore request that we stop being puritans with this fact. I would like to see many of those who raised their voice of outrage, sitting in the floor with 98 people who can only talk about how having adjectival and also in the stands above a lot of fans blinded until they throw cups, have whether they will respond strictly to the manual attached Carreño. They believe a month and had been slow to take the first game that did not exceed the verbal. Unfortunately we have a lot of Deputies, many of the reds and the blues, which have no merit or academic or moral to be there and yet they were elected, so everyone assumes their guilt by the players we have in this story we did the casting.
Another incident to discuss is the withdrawal or non-attendance of Members of the caucus of the opposition to
Sesi ng Angostura Solemn day of 15 February. Many at first, by the same means as I said in the first incident, expressing their outrage at the failure to attend the opponents of this solemn meeting, many time they changed their position on the reasons and others stood firm with her. But again I ask puritanism aside, it is very easy to ask Members to attend a very comfortable being in bed or place of work, although it is true that they were elected, it is also true that it is not recommended attend an event in which the whole audience is Chavez and I strongly doubt they can guarantee personal security, but I can guarantee inside the small chamber, let alone outdoors. Second point, there are situations in which silence or failure to appear louder than words and I think this is one of them. If it could not be complicit deputy attending a parapet to give range of the NA session, in which order he is a Commander in Chief who won the 4 soles to say out loud that if he is elected in 2012 another candidate other than Chavez as head of state, then the Armed Forces would not recognize the results. Typical of the green camouflage uniforms, they forget that they are subject to civilian authority and not the other, and that orders without question and charges are within the walls of their barracks not outside of them. Then you attend, be silent witnesses of an act void from all points of view and that honored not decorum. How to read a tweet from someone: "Tomorrow we will see the futility of the NA session productive and see what the day of Deputies opponents visiting strikers, bringing an action against the Enabling Act and other legal and resources to thus the nerve to protest the ruling.
So let my friends puritanism and "irreproachable" glass and we support intelligent action, Do not be complicit in the parapets and shows the government. I am a peaceful person and a Christian, but not puritanical or stupid. Until next time.
My description of what happened is the following: Almost immediately made a lot of Venezuelan traditional media, as well as social networks, expressing their anger and outrage at what happened with the air of chronic Puritanism. Haber, not true that we are in a highly polarized side have 98 deputies red force on the blue side and 67 enclosed in a chamber, like cats and mice imprisoned in a cell, although it is not ideal to happen, we can not forget that it is not the first time. In the so-called Fourth Republic did a lot of times. Even in the first term of the NA was a physical attack by the then Deputy Táchira, now governor of that state, César Pérez Vivas and even the same state Rep., Iris Valera.
Even in parliaments in many countries around the world has happened many times. Therefore request that we stop being puritans with this fact. I would like to see many of those who raised their voice of outrage, sitting in the floor with 98 people who can only talk about how having adjectival and also in the stands above a lot of fans blinded until they throw cups, have whether they will respond strictly to the manual attached Carreño. They believe a month and had been slow to take the first game that did not exceed the verbal. Unfortunately we have a lot of Deputies, many of the reds and the blues, which have no merit or academic or moral to be there and yet they were elected, so everyone assumes their guilt by the players we have in this story we did the casting.
Another incident to discuss is the withdrawal or non-attendance of Members of the caucus of the opposition to
Sesi ng Angostura Solemn day of 15 February. Many at first, by the same means as I said in the first incident, expressing their outrage at the failure to attend the opponents of this solemn meeting, many time they changed their position on the reasons and others stood firm with her. But again I ask puritanism aside, it is very easy to ask Members to attend a very comfortable being in bed or place of work, although it is true that they were elected, it is also true that it is not recommended attend an event in which the whole audience is Chavez and I strongly doubt they can guarantee personal security, but I can guarantee inside the small chamber, let alone outdoors. Second point, there are situations in which silence or failure to appear louder than words and I think this is one of them. If it could not be complicit deputy attending a parapet to give range of the NA session, in which order he is a Commander in Chief who won the 4 soles to say out loud that if he is elected in 2012 another candidate other than Chavez as head of state, then the Armed Forces would not recognize the results. Typical of the green camouflage uniforms, they forget that they are subject to civilian authority and not the other, and that orders without question and charges are within the walls of their barracks not outside of them. Then you attend, be silent witnesses of an act void from all points of view and that honored not decorum. How to read a tweet from someone: "Tomorrow we will see the futility of the NA session productive and see what the day of Deputies opponents visiting strikers, bringing an action against the Enabling Act and other legal and resources to thus the nerve to protest the ruling. So let my friends puritanism and "irreproachable" glass and we support intelligent action, Do not be complicit in the parapets and shows the government. I am a peaceful person and a Christian, but not puritanical or stupid. Until next time.
0 comments:
Post a Comment